You Should Know C# IStructuralEquatable Nasıl kullanılır Göstergeleri

You Should Know C# IStructuralEquatable Nasıl kullanılır Göstergeleri

Blog Article

The individual calls to IEqualityComparer.Equals end and the IStructuralEquatable.Equals method returns a value either when a method call returns false or after all array elements or tuple components have been compared.

Now, when we call Equals ourselves it will directly call our new fancy Equals that takes in a ScreenMetrics, which is great.

Reference types (read classes) don't benefit bey much. The IEquatable implementation does let you avoid a cast from System.Object but that's a very trivial gain. I still like IEquatable to be implemented for my classes since it logically makes the intent explicit.

Does anyone know what happens if you do not implement iequtalable when using generic collections? 2

It is used by the third example kakım an argument to the Equals(Object, IEqualityComparer) method of the IStructuralEquatable interface that tuples implement. It compares two Double or two Single values by using the equality operator. It passes values of any other type to the default equality comparer.

If two objects compare birli equal, the GetHashCode method for each object must return the same value. However, if two objects do hamiş compare bey equal, the GetHashCode methods for the two object do not have to return different values.

The IEquatable implementation will require one less cast for these classes and birli a result will be slightly faster than the standard object.Equals method that would be used otherwise. Kakım an example see the different implementation of the two methods:

This is very disappointing behaviour from Microsoft; I'm now wondering if I should review the list of cases I've filed and see if other ones I've submitted have been removed...

The reason C# IStructuralEquatable Nasıl kullanılır why you need the IStructuralEquatable is for defining a new way of comparision that would be right for all the objects .

I had the same question. When I ran LBushkin's example I was surprised to see that I got a different answer! Even though that answer has 8 upvotes, it is wrong. After a lot of 'reflector'ing, here is my take on things.

To achieve this, employee objects with matching SSN properties would be treated kakım logically equal, even if they were derece structurally equal. Share Improve this answer Follow

That is, you güç create your own definition of structural equality and specify that this definition be used with a collection type that accepts the IStructuralEquatable interface. The interface katışıksız two members: Equals, which tests for equality by using a specified IEqualityComparer implementation, and GetHashCode, which returns identical hash codes for objects that are equal.

Is there any legal justification for content on the web without an explicit licence being freeware? more hot questions

Specifically, I do hamiş know the exact type of the object. The only assumption I make is that it inherit from IStructuralEquatable.